The graph belows gives information about the number of cases of children in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992
Primary tabs
View(active tab)
Edit
Delete
Essay topics:
The graph belows gives information about the number of cases of children in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992
Profile picture for user Patel Romaa
Submitted by Patel Romaa on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 15:25
The line graph illustrates the information about the plethora of cases of dysentery in the proportion in Mashhad between 1983 and 1982.
Overall it can be manifested that the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983and 1992 there was an increased plethora of patients suffering from dysentery in 1989and almost declined zero cases in 1992.
At the beginning of 1983 at 100 cases, people have suffered from lossness bowls from 1983 to 1984 at the same level after 2 years in 1987 increased New 100 cases and grew up to 200 but in 1988 and suddenly decreased the cases almost 80 percent suffering from this diarrhea condition.
Furthermore, a rapid number of cases increased in 1989 almost 400 patients suffering the dysentery condition one year later by 50 cases left and almost 350 cases in 1990 and 1991 respectively the same .dramaticaly decreased cases of diarrhea in the Mashhad of zero cases in 1992.
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 78
- The graph below gives information about the numbers of cases of diarrhoea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the percentage of adults according to age and gender who do not any do physical activity in Australia summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the percentage of adults according to age and gender who do not any do physical activity in Australia 70
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Profile picture for user Patel Romaa Su...
^^^
Line 16, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s in 1990 and 1991 respectively the same .dramaticaly decreased cases of diarrhea ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58575511332 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9533419629 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 249.0 112.824112599 221% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.0 22.9334400587 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458119049255 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264999446336 0.103423049105 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17023744171 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272817840784 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.324100080111 0.0819641961636 395% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.0 13.2329268293 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.0 10.3012195122 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 11.0658536585 262% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.