The graph compares the percentage of theinternational and the percentage of UK student gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university

The bar chart depicts a comparison data between proportion of UK and international students who obtained second class or even better in eight scientific and art subjects in 2009. A short glance at the the graph reveals that well over 50 per cent of British and foreign learners achieved a second class degree or higher in seven topics except international law.

Now turning to the detail, international students dominated in major related to engineering and technology. For instance, over 80% of foreign students gained their second class grade on IT as British students were less than 60%. Contrary, local students paid their attention on sociology, art history and literature. The UK students number were higher on international law where three-quarters of British students got second class degree and the largest gap represented between the ratio of local and international students. Interestingly, home and foreign learners got almost equal percentage from accountancy and nursing.

Overall, the figure shows that British students are more successful than international students in the humanities.

Votes
Average: 6 (5 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...art subjects in 2009. A short glance at the the graph reveals that well over 50 per cen...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...art subjects in 2009. A short glance at the the graph reveals that well over 50 per cen...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternational students in the humanities.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55621301775 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04817016251 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2107806135 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29124429928 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112284654936 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511177611066 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176476458512 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762430117445 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.