The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of people living in urban areas in Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia between 1970 and 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Overall, the figure for urban residents in four Asian countries increased between 1970 and 2020 and is expected to continue growing in 2030 and 2040. Although the number of citizens in Malaysia left behind the Philippines in 1970 and 1990, almost all the time the proportion of the population who living in cities in Malaysia achieved the highest.
On one hand, the figure for the urban population in Malaysia and Indonesia has witnessed a continuously increasing trend over the period in question. Both of these countries experienced a significant rise between 1970 and 1990, by about 15% to 45% in 1990 and by 10% to just below 25% in 1990, respectively. After that, the percentage of Malaysia increased sharply before reaching a peak of approximately 85% in 2040, overtaking Philippines to become the highest. Similarly, the figure for Indonesia also reached a peak of nearly 60% in 2040, overtaking Phillipines and Thailand to become the second highest, just behind Malaysia.
On the other hand, the percentage of urban population in Philippines and Thailand experienced a slight increase between 1970 and 2040. In 1990, both two countries increased significantly, with a 20% rise to 50% in Philippines, and a 10% rise to nearly 30% in Thailand. Between 1990 and 2020, while Philippines slightly fluctuated from 50% to just above 40%, the figure for Thailand remained the same. In 2040, the two countries are expected a slight increase, Phillipines will reach its old peak of 50% and Thailand continue to increase by about 10% to 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | 61 | view |
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 61
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14184397163 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92895780496 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5181627641 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235863371534 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107239533318 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786529302229 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184319384643 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683896864794 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14184397163 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92895780496 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5181627641 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235863371534 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107239533318 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786529302229 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184319384643 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683896864794 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.