The graph on the right gives information on wages of Some country.
The graph shows the increasing percentage of salary in some country from 1993 to 2003. It can be clearly seen that the peak point was 6 percent in 1998. On the other hand, the lowest point was only 1 percent in 2002.
According to the graph, the growth rate dropped three times, the sharp drop was about 3 percent between 1998 and 1999. Then from 2000 to 2002, it continuously had a substantial decline by 2 percent. Between 1994 and 1995, the changing rate was similar to the year of 2000 and 2002, a gradual reduction.
On the other hand, the percent of upward trend is not as enormous as the decline rate. From 19997 to 1998, it rapidly climbed by 2.5 percent from 3.5 percent to 6 percent. From 1993 to 1994 and from 2002 to 2003, the rise rate is about 2 percent per year.
In conclusion, the overall income is consistently growing over the decade. Due to the rise percentage is always more than 1.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44642857143 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32846156864 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0224836622 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.9090909091 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0372461959889 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0169449344251 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406159313647 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0252968421329 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298412582098 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.