the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009.
The line graph compares changes in price for three different categories of food and drink and indicated the overall trend in the consumer-price index during the period from 1979 to 2009.
It is obvious that the upward trends can be seen in all four lines. In which, the prices for fresh and vegetables increased more significantly than that of sugar and sweet and carbonated drink, reached the higher prices than the consumer - price index at the end of the period.
In 1979, all the lines on the graph started at the same point, at about 60. The general consumer-price index increased considerably to over 200 in 1979. The prices for sugar and sweet and carbonated drink had similar trends. Although their prices rose, the figures were still lower than the consumer-price index after 1989. Over the last 24-year period, sugar and sweets were bigger in price changes than carbonated drink, went up to 200 and 150 in 2009, respectively.
Likewise, there was a sharp climb in the prices of fresh fruit and vegetables, particular after 1987. The prices finished at roughly 330 in 2009, which was over 3 times the starting figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | cocococo123 | 11 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | Huyen Trang | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | Huyen Trang | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | Huyen Trang | 78 | view |
- the chart below shows the most popular films by genre for men and women and general ticket sales for different types of film in the USA in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 91
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 56
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV 76
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88020833333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58534166341 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1854749899 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342579876331 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140780779683 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885880400145 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217786867205 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545305047292 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.