The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001.
The line graph illustrates information about amount of energy generated by fossil fuel in Europe over the course of 20 years starting from 1981.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that there were big fluctuations in the energy generation by 3 sources of fossil fuel. While the energy producing by petroleum and natural gas witnessed an upward trend, that of coal experienced a downward trend. Throughout the period, the amount of energy manufacturing by petroleum registered the highest number out of all groups studied.
Looking at the detail, as regard the energy production by petroleum fuel source, it started at about 35 trillion units in 1981 and then slightly increased to less than 40 trillion units in 1991. During the period of 1996 and 2001, there was a significant rise to reach the peak at 50 trillion units in the amount of energy generating by petroleum fuel. A similar pattern could be seen in the energy manufacture by natural gas fuel, in 1981 the figure was less than 10 trillion units, this was followed by a very steady rise to around 32 trillion units in 2001.
On the contrary, regarding the amount of energy generated by coal, 30 trillion units was generated in the year 1981. After that, the energy production using coal generated less and less energy year by year, by 2001 the figured has declined to less than 20 trillion units.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87659574468 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5695433819 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8034715022 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365851419605 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177761067106 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108046692722 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256835749024 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872671958527 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.