The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the total expenditure on books in four countries over a period of ten years.
Overall, it is evident that Germans spent the most money on books throughout the entire period. However, it was Austria that enjoyed the highest rise in total book sale revenue during the 10 years.
In 1995, Germany had the highest total expenditure on books, at 80 million USD. France and Italy saw spending figures of approximately 55 million USD, whereas Austrians only spent 30 million USD on books. Between 1995 and 1997, while the other countries witnessed a rise in the amount of money spent on books, France's figures fell, from 55 million USD to only 50 million USD.
From 1999 to 2003, Germany was the only country to experience a decline in book sale revenue, sliding from 90 million to just 85 million USD. Austria overtook Italy in book sales in 2003, pushing Italy to last place among the four surveyed countries, and eventually reached a peak of 70 million USD in 2005. France's total book expenditure rose slightly during the final six years of the period, ending the period at 75 million USD.
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- “We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning .”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 90
- Technological development leads to a lot of environmental issues. Some people think a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment, while others argue that technology itself can solve it. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 90
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82901554404 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36284200975 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8552061345 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135608096829 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067233494623 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377559338489 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892763466145 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193324849312 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.