This chart shows historical data from 2000 to 2010 of the yearly income of three different bakeries located in London.
Only Berrie´s Buns had lower incomes in the last year than in the first one. The earnings of this bakery remained roughly constant during the first 5 years and then they plummeted from 90000 pounds to 60000 pounds. Subsequently, It had another fall in 2007 when the income was reduced by 33%.
In contrast, the other two bakeries have a significant growth during the decade especially The lovely loaves which doubled its income in 2003 while Robbie's Bakery's remained the same. Nevertheless, both had a sharp rise in 2007 followed by a slow growth.
At the beginning of the decade Berrie´s Bun was the most lucrative bakery; However, in 2010 it was the one with the lowest income. On the other hand, Robbie's Bakery was the most successful in 2010, earning twice more than the next bakery, Lovely Loaves, and almost three times more than Berrie's Buns .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... a significant growth during the decade.The lovely loaves doubled its income in 200...
^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...aves and almost three times Berries Buns .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8164556962 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39324497993 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2100837829 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134622615203 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627621833277 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806440913697 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101630764692 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874094728552 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.