The graph shows how many 13-year-old students studied French and Mandarin between 2000 and the present day in a school in England.
Overall, it can be seen that more students have been choosing to study Mandarin, but French is still the most popular language option.
According to the data, from 2000 to 2005, French has decreased in popularity. During this time, the number of students choosing French started at the highest point by around 150. Then it decreased gradually and hit the lowest point in 2005 by 90 students. On the other hand, the trend for Mandarin is the opposite. Starting at the bottom by nearly 10 students, there was a steady increase over the period of 5 years and then reached the peak at 75 students in 2005.
Since 2005, the trends have not changed as much. French increased again in 2006 and reach about 100 students, similar to that of 2004. Afterthat, it has remained fairly stable since then at about 90 students. In contrast, the number of students taking Mandarin dipped in 2006 and then fluctuated, before it returned to 75.
The graph shows how many 13-year-old students studied French and Mandarin between 2000 and the present day in a school in England.
Overall, it can be seen that more students have been choosing to study Mandarin, but French is still the most popular language option.
According to the data, from 2000 to 2005, French has decreased in popularity. During this time, the number of students choosing French started at the highest point by around 150. Then it decreased gradually and hit the lowest point in 2005 by 90 students. On the other hand, the trend for Mandarin is the opposite. Starting at the bottom by nearly 10 students, there was a steady increase over the period of 5 years and then reached the peak at 75 students in 2005.
Since 2005, the trends have not changed as much. French increased again in 2006 and reach about 100 students, similar to that of 2004. Afterthat, it has remained fairly stable since then at about 90 students. In contrast, the number of students taking Mandarin dipped in 2006 and then fluctuated, before it returned to 75.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-24 | Thanhvan9699 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76630434783 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40238908145 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5751759383 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7272727273 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456155140332 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165288203911 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.230750169517 0.0843802449381 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377955358898 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271297822223 0.0819641961636 331% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.