The graph shows the income of four cafés in New York over the last year.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the income trend of four different cafés in New York over last year.
Overall, there were some fluctuations from month to month in the income of the four cafés, it is noticeable that there were upward trends in the income of Internet Express, Wi-fi Café and Café Cool, while The Tea Room experienced the opposite one.
In January, The Tea Room’s earnings were approximately $160,000 a month. They varied from the first month to October, then fell dramatically to around $50,000 in December. By contrast, the income of Café Cool witnessed a fluctuation over the first ten months, followed by a sudden growth to $120,000.
As regards the Internet Express’s sales, they experienced a downward trend to June but, after that, increased gradually, ending the year at approximately $130,000. Likewise, the trend for Wi-fi Café was upward. Though there was a decrease from about $100,000 to $60,000 between July and September, it then rocketed to $190,000 in the last month.
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expressed in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The graph shows the income of four caf s in New York over the last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, so, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10365853659 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66062655599 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603658536585 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.738695721 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169478983184 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881958418191 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122990299619 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154067166686 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14227054173 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.