The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York in last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The provided line chart clearly illustrates information regarding the income of 4 particular cafes in New York from January to December over the previous year. The mentioned cafes namely the tea room, internet express, wi-fi cafe, and cafe cool. Overall, it is obvious that there are 2 general trends: an upward and a downwards.

In detail, it can be explained that the figure for the income of internet express, wi-fi cafe, and cafe cool experienced an upward trend. In the amount of internet express, there was a gentle reduce from 100 in January to 80 in April and then a constant remains at 80 until July. After that, it rose gradually to 140 in December. Likewise, although the revenue of wi-fi cafe had increased and fluctuated moderately from 30 to 60 during the first 9 months before it climbed dramatically to 190 in December. Similarly, the earnings of cafe cool had fluctuated steadily since the beginning of the year until the tenth month before peaking at 120 at the end of the year.

Conversely, the downward trend took place in the income of the tea room; its income fluctuated from 160 in January to 140 in October and then fell swiftly to only 50 in December.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a downward' or simply 'downwards'?
Suggestion: a downward; downwards
...ere are 2 general trends: an upward and a downwards. In detail, it can be explained that...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75242718447 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58912671599 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6249447274 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140960883364 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589111977817 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602386928417 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10364397688 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572654612783 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.