The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 - 2010
The line graph gives the information about the number of international meetings in three cities in the period of 30 years ( from 1980 to 2010)
It is clear that there were steady changes in organizing global meetings through out the period shown. Also, the number of international meetings in city C rose dramatically and overtook those figures from city A and B in 2010
In 1980 city C did not organize any global conferences, while city A and city B had 30 and 35 meetings respectively. Through out the following 20 years, the number of global meetings held in city C had significant growth to 35, while those figures of city A and city B fell slightly around 25 meetings..
Over a decade from 2000, three cities presented a minimal decrease in organizing global meetings. By 2010, the number of conferences in city C had dropped to nearly 30, likewise city A and city B had had lower figures, at closely 25 for both
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n three cities in the period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010 It is clear that ther...
^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...y changes in organizing global meetings through out the period shown. Also, the number of i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: Throughout
...B had 30 and 35 meetings respectively. Through out the following 20 years, the number of g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant growth to 35, while those figures of city A and city B fell slightly around 2...
^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... city B fell slightly around 25 meetings.. Over a decade from 2000, three cities ...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease in organizing global meetings. By 2010, the number of conferences in city ...
^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...o nearly 30, likewise city A and city B had had lower figures, at closely 25 for both ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62804878049 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76549095355 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5989399194 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305458309607 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173138187911 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769250026107 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224841985285 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125473690659 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.