The given graph illustrates the data about international conferences among three cities during the period from 1980 to 2010. The trends swung extremely throughout the tenure of 40 years.
To commence with, City A and B had witnessed highest number of conferences in relative to City C in the beginning. After 5 years, meetings number had plummeted in city A and B that was 30 and 20 respectively whilist an upsurge was recorded in City C which accounted 10 meetings. The meetings in City C had skyrocketted in year 1990 whereas City C just lagging behind by number of 10 from City B.
Marching ahead, in the year 2000, meetings in both cities A and b fell down by accounting only 24 meets. The striking fact of the graph is that, with an upward trend, the City C had reached at the highest position and encountered 35 meetings. The quantity of meetings in both cities A and B had remained almost same in the year 2005. After that, with some oscillations, the number of meetings in three capital cities dipped in next consecutive 5 years.
Suffice to say, the more people inclined towards meetings in last years of given period as contrast to beginning. The highest number of meetings had been seen in city C whereas other cities had also contributed for the meetings in the given tenure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'witnessed the highest'.
Suggestion: witnessed the highest
.... To commence with, City A and B had witnessed highest number of conferences in relative to Ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68859649123 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70378640263 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0447533312 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.1818181818 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242390740526 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106276608534 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120825802055 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171973024125 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114124238006 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.