The Graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an
English town in 2012
The given bar graph clearly presents the quantity of boys and girls playing six kinds of sport (tennis, badminton, cycling, swimming, football, and hockey) in an English in 2012. Overall, it is evident that the number of boys and girls playing tennis, swimming, football, badminton, and cycling were similar, while that of playing hockey was totally different.
In detail, it can be explained that the amount of boys and girls playing football, tennis and swimming accounted for highest, or at about boys 60, 50, and 40 person respectively, along with the number of girls at about boys 20, 35, and 50 person respectively. Meanwhile, the number of boys and girls playing badminton and cycling were quiet a lot, the number of boys or about at 30 and 35 person respectively, and girls or about at 40 and 20 person respectively.
Finally, it is interesting that the figures of playing hockey were accounted for the lowest, boys and girls or at only 15 and 5 person respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | giangngoc | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | chikien06 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | myduyen282 | 93 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | Taytor2609 | 85 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | Puja Bastakoti | 100 | view |
- The Graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in anEnglish town in 2012 67
- the following diagram shows the percentage of each region s male and female population aged over fifteen who can read and write 84
- percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 73
- the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...ighest, or at about boys 60, 50, and 40 person respectively, along with the number of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...r of girls at about boys 20, 35, and 50 person respectively. Meanwhile, the number of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...he number of boys or about at 30 and 35 person respectively, and girls or about at 40 ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...tively, and girls or about at 40 and 20 person respectively. Finally, it is interesti...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...est, boys and girls or at only 15 and 5 person respectively.
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r at only 15 and 5 person respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89759036145 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7454616876 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463855421687 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1343506743 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.6 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327631566864 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205193792775 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434476008587 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222137185768 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704049826775 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.