The graph shows the number of fatal injuries resulting in death of workers in New Zealand between 1992 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The bar chart above gives information about the workers who have died during the work reported over the 19 years. Overall, the trend is likely to be a downward trend and in some short period, the numbers have increased again.
As can be seen, the number of injuries began approximately about 6217 and has risen in two following years until it reaches the peak at 6632 in 1994. It has followed a plummeting pattern throughout the period between 1995 and 2003, except for the year 1997, which showed a slight increase in comparison with the previous year, then it has dipped modestly until 2002.
In 2004, the number of death worker has climbed by about 200 and reached to 5764. It is a period of gradually increasing from 2002 to 2006, then it dropped significantly to 4551 in 2009. Overall numbers of fatalities fluctuated, though there is a modest decrease at the end of the period in comparison with the beginning of the survey.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (5 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68902439024 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53097262473 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640243902439 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0355744123 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141390168411 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630755753692 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376490086023 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090661849581 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171354812971 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.