The presented line graph illustrates the information about the quantity of British people who got married and divorced from 1975 to 2000.
The initial impression from the graph is that, the figures for 2nd marriages and divorces witnessed upward trends over the given period while that for the first marriages experienced a decline. Moreover, the total marriages saw a sharp increase in the first 10 years and then dropped moderately before recovering slightly in the final five years.
The number of first marriages stayed well beyond the others at about 320 thousands in 1975. Following that was the second marriages with about 150 thousand and the data of divorces was under-neath at just around 90 thousands. Over 25 years, Whilst Fewer British got married for the first time with its figure surging slightly before dropping to 300 thousand in 2010. More people in the UK remarried with its data climbing up to 300 thousand. Regarding the figure for divorce, it bottomed out at nearly 90 thousand and then gradually overtook before reaching the same number as that of the second marriages in the last year of the period shown.
In term of the total marriages, after rising considerably, Britain saw a considerable decline in marriages, followed by a leap from 1995 to 2000 at about 580 thousand
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, second, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5901569276 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5586765311 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216897453775 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910423654113 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653110715376 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128519324776 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594248943103 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, second, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5901569276 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5586765311 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216897453775 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910423654113 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653110715376 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128519324776 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594248943103 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.