The given line graph compares the three countries namely USA, Japan, Sweden in term of the number of people who are over 65 from 1940 to 2040
From basic observation, there has been an upward fluctuation in the percentage of Sweden and USA' population aged over 65. Moreover, according to current prediction, this figure for all countries will have a growth.
In 1940, Starting at approximately 10%, American was the country with the highets percentage of the old people, follwing by Sweden at about 6% and Japan at 5% respectively. From 1940 to 2000there was gradual leap in the percentage of the elderly in the USA and Sweden and then followed by a steady decline. Whereas, a slight reduction of 3% was seen in the figure for Japan over the same period. From the beginning of 2000 until the present, the number of Swedish elderly population likewise that in USA has had a small jump. By contrast, this figure for USA has witnessed no changes
Over the period of prediction from 2020 to 2040, the proportion of old people in the 3 countries experiences a progress. Especially Japan is planned to upsurge suddenly and become the country with the highest number of the elderly of the three countries at about 27% even though it started at the lowest point of all at the begginning. It is estimated that Sweden stands the second highest at 25% and American ranks the third at about 23%.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 84
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 67
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or in further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hree countries namely USA, Japan, Sweden in term of the number of people who are ...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...d people in the 3 countries experiences a progress. Especially Japan is planned to upsurge...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, second, then, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71604938272 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6235721753 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4934170753 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157679578512 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652286163459 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506382031566 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11726799496 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379952873503 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.