The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Below line graph illustrates the number of visitors went to four different international museums from 1980 to 2015. Overall, visitors kept increasing for two famous museums, Louvre and Vatican Museums. On the contrast, London science Museum and Shenzhen Museum had low numbers of visitors.
To begin with, Louvre had roughly eight million visitors in 1980, and they increased up to nine million till 2015. Similarly, it started with five million visitors for Vatican Museums approximately in 1980, and they raised constantly up-to nine million until 2015.
Besides, London science Museum had almost four million visitors in 1980 and the count dramatically reduced to two million till 2015. Additionally, Shenzhen Museum had four million visitors in 1980, and they kept declining till 2000. But it again surprisingly picked up a growth towards the former count until 2015.
Finally, it can be concluded that Louvre and Vatican Museums had gained popularity, but other two were unable to maintain the same in the span of thirty-five years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | Indrayani Yadav | 93 | view |
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 73
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowled 11
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 68
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 58
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en Museum had low numbers of visitors. To begin with, Louvre had roughly eight ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stantly up-to nine million until 2015. Besides, London science Museum had almos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h towards the former count until 2015. Finally, it can be concluded that Louvre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, similarly, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35975609756 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60761109707 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7568810288 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191775728055 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995700932512 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741681737355 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122774921482 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717121048433 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.