The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
- Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart shows the proportion of men and women who taught at seven different departments in a particular university in 2012.
Firstly, there is a big gender disparity in two of the faculties: in Education most of the teachers are females while in Engineering the larger part of the work body are males. In Education, almost 80% of the team are women and slightly above 20% are men. In Engineering, there are about 80% male individuals teaching and around 20% females.
On the other hand, there is an almost equal amount of male and female professors in the Medicine department with a percentage of around 50% each (51% females and 49% males). There are more men working in the Law, the Business and in the Science departments than women. In Arts, there are about 55% of female faculty members and about 45% of male teachers.
Overall, it is noticeable that there are more male instructors than female ones. But it is also evident that that are more female than male teachers in both Arts and Education sectors. Moreover, it is perceptible that women are vindicating in areas considered to be conducted by men such as Law, Business and Science with a rate of around 40% against of a percentage of about 60% of men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Tatiana Mira | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...han female ones. But it is also evident that that are more female than male teachers in b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7037037037 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62930357916 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0295355415 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138901664558 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573395281628 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449969902199 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863252657884 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367747682786 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.