The graph shows the profit figures for three football clubs - Dandenong, Geelong and Noble Park. Summarise and make comparisions where relevant.
The yield for three separate football clubs/teams ( Dandenong, Geelong and Noble Park) throughout a calendar year are exemplified in the line graph/chart/diagram/illustration. Units are measured in thousand dollars.
Overall/In general, outside of the first quarter, it is obvious to state that the financial performance of Dandenong is reasonably more than/fared much better than those of two other clubs, with its acquisition booming along the entire period (removed), which indicates a definitely dissimilar trend from that of Noble Park, with its earnings dropping off throughout the year.
The figure of profit gained by Dandenong commences with around 48, slightly smaller than that of Noble Park. Nevertheless, the first quarter ends up with approximately 60. Moreover this number continues to surge with the passing of time and hits the peak with (a whopping) 100 eventually, almost outweighs by 40 compared to Geelong and 90 units compared to Noble Park// 40 and 90 compared to Geelong and Noble Park in turn/respectively.
As for the other two clubs, the earnings of Noble Park are completely contradictory to that of Dandenong. The most pecuniarily successful time (when) of this club comes up with around fifty thousand dollars; nonetheless, after four quarters, this number finishes with ten thousand dollars, the most humble figure in the whole graph. In the meantime, the profit of Geelong witnesses a different/distinct/contradictory… trend, oscillating throughout the year, but in the end it reaches a pretty high digit of 60.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for three separate football clubs/teams Dandenong, Geelong and Noble Park throug...
^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ram/illustration. Units are measured in thousand dollars. Overall/In general, ou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nits are measured in thousand dollars. Overall/In general, outside of the first...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings dropping off throughout the year. The figure of profit gained by Dandenong...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... quarter ends up with approximately 60. Moreover this number continues to surge with the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g and Noble Park in turn/respectively. As for the other two clubs, the earnings...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47899159664 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.91226788232 2.65546596893 147% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.9879005026 43.030603864 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.888888889 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256131917528 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112429983052 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101542677233 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168974019721 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834008745782 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.