The line graph depicts the variation in proportion of senior citizen in three different countries over a period of 100 years since 1940.
Overall, the total proportion of aged people in all the given countries are in an increasing trend, moreover the significant changes could be seen in case of Japan.
During 1940 to 1960 the proportion of aged people in both Sweden and the USA were just below 10% and during the same period only 5% Japanese were aged above 65 years. Over the next 40 years the ratio of senior citizen in Sweden and the USA soared with some fluctuations, where as their number significantly reduced in Japan. Demographic prediction shows that the number of aged people in Sweden and the USA are rising and are predicted to be just below 20% in 2020 but in Japan it shows a steady increase until 2020(10%). Furthermore in the year 2040 the ratio of senior citizen in Japan is expected to shoot up and will reach over 25% while in case of Sweden and the USA their number will progress steadily and expected to cross over 20%
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of senior citizen in Sweden and the USA soared with some fluctuations, where as ...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...the USA soared with some fluctuations, where as their number significantly reduced in J...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... shows a steady increase until 202010%. Furthermore in the year 2040 the ratio of senior ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cted to shoot up and will reach over 25% while in case of Sweden and the USA thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59893048128 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40338489889 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.1390512452 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234949541453 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115013931758 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758731858942 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164073640326 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804189898727 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.