The line graph compares and contrasts the percentage of people aged 65 or more in three different countries over 100 years.
Generally speaking, three nations all saw an upward trend, and it's expected a dramatic increase in Japan during the last 20 years.
From 1940 until now, there were wild fluctuations in the proportion of the elderly population in three countries, although the trends were upward. In detail, the figure for Japan started at the point of 5%, then reduced remarkably to roughly 3% in 1960. It plateaued at this value during the following more than 25 years before having a significant growth to about 8% in 2020. Besides, during the first 80 years, the people were 65 years old or more, which rose by 11% and 6% in Sweden and the USA, respectively.
Looking into the future, the proportion of the elderly people in Japan is predicted to go up steeply to hit a peak of 27% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, the last 20 years will experience growth in the figure for the rest nations to reach 23% and 25% by 2040.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that medical care should be free Do you agree or disagree 84
- Proportional Government Spending on Arts in 1995 and 2005 73
- Some say that advertisements of toys and snacks have a huge impact on children and their parents and therefore advertising to children should be banned Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree different countries over 100 years. Generally speaking, three nations all sa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58602150538 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50801121312 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 13.3551254206 43.030603864 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199379096091 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790292545803 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10741110433 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128968876262 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122234289435 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.