The graphs below depict the GDP expenditure of the UAE on two different items (1985-1993) and the rate of infant mortality and of life expectancy in the same place between 1970 and 1992.
How much expenditure (in % of GDP) was spent on health and education by UAE government during period 1985 to 1993, how many babies died (per 1000 births) and how long age of life was expected for people in UAE between 1970 and 1992, are depicted by the graphs.
It is immediately apparent that the GDP expenditure of UAE on education showed its superiority over that on health. Moreover, both of expenditures increase relatively during the period. In addition, while the general trend was for life expectancy figure to slight rise, there was a descending trend in infant mortality figure over the timeframe.
Regarding the number of expenditure, education experienced a noticeable growth from about 10 in 1985 to around 15 in 1993 –the greatest proportion of this section. At the same time, health stood at roughly 8, witnessing a gradual decrease in 1990, and then grew remarkably of 2 at the end of the period.
Turning to the infant mortality and life expectancy figure, the number of baby dies stood at nearly 60 in 1970 and then climbed moderately of about 10 in 1992. Furthermore, the life expectancy dropped dramatically by almost 70% over the 20-year period.
- The graphs below depict the GDP expenditure of the UAE on two different items (1985-1993) and the rate of infant mortality and of life expectancy in the same place between 1970 and 1992. 78
- The best way to educate children is by using internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion ? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children ? 67
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 73
- The diagram below shows how a central heating system in ahouse works 76
- Today more people are overweight than ever before. What in your opinion are the primary causes of this? What are the main effects of this epidemic? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, then, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97969543147 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81104051567 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1854068331 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275699854134 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103088371863 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703741657197 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157523373764 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697774521074 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.