The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2000 and 2010, and by level of education for the year 2002 and 2010
The two bar graphs illustrate the number of people who owned computers from 2002 to 2010, as well as their academic level between 2002 and 2010.
Overall, the majority of people owned a computer in 2010, whilst the minority group was in 2002. There was a steady increase for computer ownership from 2002 to 2010. It is of note, more postgraduate qualification holder owned computers in 2010 above all other categories. Between 2002 and 2004, the number of people with high school diploma and those without almost doubled in 2010.
The highest number of people who owned computer was in 2010, at around 63%, while few people had computers in 2002 with 58%. There was a gradual increase of the population who had computers.
Furthermore, post-graduate students were the major owners of computers in 2010, as well as in 2002 with around 90% and 80% respectively. The number of people who qualified with high school diploma and those without in 2002 doubled. The percentage in 2010 , just above 10% increase. A gradual rise was seen from 2000 and 2010 for every level of education with a computer.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services 95
- Some people think that school should teach students to understand right, wrong and good behaviour, instead of this being only parents responsibility. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement ? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in 2002 doubled. The percentage in 2010 , just above 10% increase. A gradual rise...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92513368984 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57206565416 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4119634911 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7272727273 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356381767599 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159489407102 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855405555148 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246788404717 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694088976281 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.