The line graphs illustrate the information about full-time and part-time workers, which is divided by genders and age group in Australia over 20 years from 1973 to 1993.
Overall, the percentage of people, who work in a full-time job, is higher than people, who work not a full day. The popularity of part-time work increased over period given, while the number of people in a full-time job slightly went down. The least percentage of workers is older people.
With regards to the full-time workers, it can be stated that men worked more than women in each age group for both years. The most popular period for female is 20-25, where worked more than 55 percent of women. For males it hard to single out one age group, in ages from 20 to 60 worked more than 60% of men population.
As for part-time workers, graph for women looks similar. However, the most popular age for working is 35-39, when worked more than 30 % and 20 % in 1993 and 1973 respectively. While for men the popularity of working fell down with age.
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part-time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 59
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management e 78
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 74
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break the world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and ho 67
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and 20 % in 1993 and 1973 respectively. While for men the popularity of working fell ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67403314917 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40145128167 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.114634146341 3489% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9200501113 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217299906864 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105498186415 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747765948859 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157006517227 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051331120187 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.