The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts compare the amount of electricity produced and the sources used for its production in Australia and France in two separate years, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the total electricity production increased dramatically from 1980 to 2000 in both countries despite the differences in the sources used. It is also noticeable that coal was the main source of electricity generation in Australia in the years given, while in France nuclear power overtook coal and natural gas in 2000.
Coal was used to produce 50 units of the total 100 units of electricity in Australia in 1980, and this figure rose to 130 units out of 170 units in 2000. By contrast, nuclear power became the most important source in France in 2000 producing approximately 75% of its total electricity at 170 units.
Electricity production from hydro power in Australia went up from 20 units in 1980 to 36 units in 2000 but in France, the amount of electricity produced from this source dropped from 5 units to 2 units. Oil, on the other hand, remained a significant source in France but its use declined in Australia. In both countries, the production of electricity from natural gas was significantly bigger in 1980 compared in 2000.
- The chart below displays the shares of expenditure on selected categories in the United States, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009. 56
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2019 and future projections in 2025. 78
- The diagrams below show the house designs for cold and warm climates 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 78
- The bar below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...ctricity generation in Australia in the years given, while in France nuclear power ov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93170731707 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82558212351 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7286511256 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344715724862 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18320822279 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975187648982 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24673053818 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492003702704 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.