In contemporary years, climate change has become one of the biggest threats to the environment. Many believe that using non-renewable energy should be banned, while other groups oppose to this view and explain this replacement leads to declining economic growth. This essay points out two contrasting perspectives and concludes my view which the latter one should be taken into consideration.
It is true that utilizing renewable energies could benefit the environment in different ways. As most of these resources are more environmentally friendly compared with other fuels, considering them as a first option will preserve our living habitats. According to an article published by Times magazine, 25% of air pollution are produced by cars which burn gasoline and this amount of pollution will be decreased to 5% if people change their vehicles by electric ones. Moreover, due to the advancement of green technology in recent years, there are numerous solutions for different cases and most of them are available in shops. Take the solar panel as an illustration, business developers have produced various panels for different situation and different sizes which enables people to choose the proper option.
On the other hand, there are still some drawbacks of replacing current type of energy with renewable one. First, fossil fuels are much inexpensive compared with other alternatives and then business owner prefer cost-effective options to produce more products and create more jobs. Second, shifting to new resources needs a huge amount of budget to purchase new equipment, that is why factories do not have intention to change the current situation. Finally, distribution of green energies is not effective at the moment and it should be improved to involve it in indoctrination, otherwise factories face frequent issues like lack of energy, for example, charging station points for hybrid vehicles are less than one fifth of gas station in USA.
In conclusion, it is common knowledge that climate change is a big concern in the modern era. Although wide utilizing of green resources could improve the quality of air and there are various ways to make it public, I believe this trend not only increase the product prices, but also decreases the number of jobs created by employer.
- Parents who work in jobs that require a lot of traveling have no time for their family How does this affect the family and the parents 84
- You have lost an item of value on a train 73
- The graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China Japan and the United States Value is estimated in term of australian dollars billions 11
- Some people believe that famine is caused by climate change and preventing this will stop famine What is your view of this 78
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the number of jobs created by employer.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 965.302439024 200% => OK
No of words: 365.0 196.424390244 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28493150685 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82975902209 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 106.607317073 207% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605479452055 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 283.868780488 216% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1032005251 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.785714286 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0152515710384 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00585731834474 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0113793986925 0.0843802449381 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00787278197597 0.15604864568 5% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00886609882065 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 40.7170731707 260% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.