The graphs provided the proportion of males and females in secondary and higher education in Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), Latin America and East Asia.
At the first glance, the percentages of both gender in Europe takes first place in Secondary and Higher education, while the bottom place is witnessed in SSA and the moderate rates are observed in Latin America and East Asia for both sexes.
In greater detail, the figures of girls in three of the four regions are more than boys, only SSA is different. In Europe, one hundred percent and ninety percent for females and males respectively, while the rates of girls in SSA is twenty percent, more than double of boys. What stand out is the same proportion of men in Latin America and women in East Asia stand at forty - two percent, whereas almost fifty percent for Latin America women and East Asia men.
In contrast, the rates of males in higher education are more than females in three regions, only Europe is noticed a different level, with three percent less in males.
Despite that, the rates of both sexes in Europe are still in the first place at forty - five percent for men and nearly fifty percent for women while these figures for SSA is noted the bottom place at twenty and twenty-two percent. Also noteworthy is the fact that the levels of boys in Latin America are more than one-third of girls whereas the approximate rate of men in East Asia, twenty-seven percent, and women, twenty-five percent.
The graphs provided the proportion of males and females in secondary and higher education in Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), Latin America and East Asia.
At the first glance, the percentages of both gender in Europe takes first place in Secondary and Higher education, while the bottom place is witnessed in SSA and the moderate rates are observed in Latin America and East Asia for both sexes.
In greater detail, the figures of girls in three of the four regions are more than boys, only SSA is different. In Europe, one hundred percent and ninety percent for females and males respectively, while the rates of girls in SSA is twenty percent, more than double of boys. What stand out is the same proportion of men in Latin America and women in East Asia stand at forty - two percent, whereas almost fifty percent for Latin America women and East Asia men.
In contrast, the rates of males in higher education are more than females in three regions, only Europe is noticed a different level, with three percent less in males.
Despite that, the rates of both sexes in Europe are still in the first place at forty - five percent for men and nearly fifty percent for women while these figures for SSA is noted the bottom place at twenty and twenty-two percent. Also noteworthy is the fact that the levels of boys in Latin America are more than one-third of girls whereas the approximate rate of men in East Asia, twenty-seven percent, and women, twenty-five percent.
- The graphs provided the proportion of males and females in secondary and higher education in Europe Sub Saharan Africa SSA Latin America and East Asia At the first glance the percentages of both gender in Europe takes first place in Secondary and Higher e 67
- Across Europe the containment measures adopted to slow the spread of coronavirus will lead all economies to contract in 2020 We believe that Italy which currently reports the highest number of deaths worldwide saw its output drop by 5 quarter on quarter i
- ut the eggs in the centre of the dish with the vegetables and herbs around the edge the edge of something the right hand edge of the page Jennifer walked to the edge of the wood Billy sat on the edge of the bed He stood at the water s edge staring across
- LINE GRAPH Birth Rates In China and the USA The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 The graph provided the changes in the fertility rates of China and the USA from 1920 to 2000 At the first glance the
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...place at twenty and twenty-two percent. Also noteworthy is the fact that the levels ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8031496063 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3370183275 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425196850394 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0263585029 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389729646329 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208363685395 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202691315289 0.0843802449381 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300286846761 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20535520239 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.