Given is a bar chart which delineates comparative data regarding the owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
A more detailed look illustrates that percentages for two different accommodation types experienced exactly opposite trends. While the proportion of residents of their own property saw a swift upward trend from nearly 23 percent to approximately 65 percent until end of the given period, percentage of people who rents house experienced a sharp decrease from 77% to 35%.
In 1918, there was a highest gap between the proportion of accommodation owners and renters with 54 percent. Nonetheless, being resident of own house gained popularity year by year and by 1971 there was an equal proportion of owned and rented accommodation. Furthermore, renting accommodation continued to lose its commonness until 2001 when the nearly 69% of population lived in their own house and 31% rented, before a small rebound that bucked a trend at the end of the period with owned accommodation declining to roughly 64% and rented houses climbing to 36%.
- Some people think that the best way to get the news is through newspapers while others think it is through online media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- It is better for children to read by using online materials or by using printed material Discuss and give your own opinion 87
- Many people are afraid to leave their home because of crime Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime While others feel that little action can be done to stop crime What is your view 78
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...se from 77% to 35%. In 1918, there was a highest gap between the proportion of a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2183908046 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06829817532 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0061725749 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.333333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344097006451 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170508690919 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141328242335 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265033567513 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158843964045 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.