IELTS Plus 3 - Writing Practice Test 1
the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000,2005 and 2010 about the university. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table graph show the attitude of students in 10 years, and given rating percentages of different aspects of a university in three different year 2000,2005 and 2010.
As per table, the mostly increased percentage in electronic resources in given 10 years, from percent 45 in 2000, and percentage drastically increased 22 in 2005 by 72, and 88 percentage in 2010. There was also overall improvement in rating in teaching quality, the percentage shows equally 65,63 and 69 in given 10 years.
Furthermore, there were poor ratings at the beginning of period for the range of modules offered 32 percent in 2000 and they got worse, falling steadily down from 30 percent in 2005 and 27 percent in 2000.There was also good attitude to print resources, rising from 87 percent in 2000 and falling increased 2 percent more in 2005 and last 88 percent show in 2010.
Moreover, there were same percentage showed in building and teaching facilities by 77 percentage.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-09-19 | kajal A. Patel | 73 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- While studying abroad provides on opportunity to broaden one s experience it also presents the danger of negative influences 74
- There are many different types of music in the world today. why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays ? 56
- Some movies are serious designed to make the audience think other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain which type of movie do you prefer 61
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...qually 65,63 and 69 in given 10 years. Furthermore, there were poor ratings at ...
^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... percent in 2005 and 27 percent in 2000.There was also good attitude to print resourc...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'moreover', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225988700565 0.268076937826 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.112994350282 0.116061578633 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0621468926554 0.0759168565197 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0564971751412 0.0366838410393 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00564971751412 0.0131127313244 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.175141242938 0.155750635184 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0508474576271 0.0379272487307 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75671023199 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00564971751412 0.0210936926555 27% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0395480225989 0.0948980150116 42% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 967.0 1161.00487805 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.9 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96913580247 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358024691358 0.337110787985 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29012345679 0.247514529752 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197530864198 0.171178102325 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148148148148 0.112407865282 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75671023199 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.546246751206 102% => OK
Word variations: 46.5332208135 49.3433353143 94% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 8.93414634146 56% => OK
Sentence length: 32.4 23.0094962315 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.6822528859 42.9750493124 216% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.4 135.714022679 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 23.0094962315 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 61.412345679 47.7609492067 129% => OK
Elegance: 2.58064516129 2.94281807926 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346386960821 0.418131533498 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.23817767974 0.181151798455 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0751398140058 0.0850326197045 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.933630137824 0.706616315825 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0886458038084 0.157042692854 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22423150754 0.228904883108 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826444839444 0.108899403657 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322447293756 0.367819155151 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.1250768553 0.0812612215331 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237761682866 0.316326947829 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904333578088 0.0921553760075 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.