Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Over the last half-century, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of vehicles. this resulted in numerous traffic jams especially in the big cities and consequently, high levels of air pollution. Although, there are those who believe that increasing oil prices might help solve this problem. I am strongly inclined to believe that higher petrol prices will have serious drawbacks on our society.
Firstly, oil and gas play a fundamental role in the industry, since most of the heavy types of machinery used in different industries are operated by petrol. For example, a recent study conducted in Japan has revealed the number of career opportunities is inversely proportional to the prices of petrol. In addition, higher prices of petrol will indirectly influence the prices of the various goods in the market through increasing the cost of their transportation. Lastly, this will burden the people and limit their freedom to travel to enjoy their leisure time. Undoubtedly, the growth of oil and gas prices will create new problems.
On the other hand, there are some other ways to tackle this problem. To begin with, improving methods of public transportation as well as the increase in their availability everywhere around the clock, will significantly reduce the use of private cars to illustrate, a recent study published in Canada was showed that the upward trend in the various means of public transportation such as buses and trains resulted in decrease the number of traffic fans & traffic jams and traffic road accidents by around 25% Moreover, the government should invest more on repairing and maintaining roads as well as construction of new roads to solve the problem and traffic congestion. Furthermore, the scientists should search for the sources of clean energy such as solar power and nuclear power to replace the fossil fuel.
To sum up, it can be clearly seen that the cons of increasing petrol prices outweigh the pros to the government and scientists and prevent the situation from further deterioration.
- Causes and effects of falling reading scores among children 11
- Causes and effects of falling reading scores among children 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tic increase in the number of vehicles. this resulted in numerous traffic jams espec...
^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...equently, high levels of air pollution. Although, there are those who believe that incre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sulted in decrease the number of traffic fans & traffic jams and traffic road acc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 965.302439024 178% => OK
No of words: 331.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18731117825 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87145838586 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 106.607317073 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558912386707 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 283.868780488 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 133.289470103 43.030603864 310% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.076923077 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 5.23603664747 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154899199425 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553193894363 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370560147954 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925783760252 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103560848112 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 40.7170731707 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.