the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005,2010 and 2015. The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years.
The table illustrates the US’s economic value from international students between 2005 and 2015 and the bar graph shows the disparity in the total number of international students from three countries during the same period.
Looking at the table, one can see that the total amount of expenditure value which international contributed to the economics of the US surged significantly in 10-years period. Interestingly, the economic value from the abroad students in 2015 was more three-times the value of its in the year 2005, from $10.1 billion to $35.8 billion.
According to the bar graph, it is evidence that there was an upward trend in the number of international students from three countries over the course of 10 years. Particularly, China was the nation which had the smallest number of students who study abroad, but in 2015 it surpassed the others countries to reach at the top spot of the increment of international students. Also, there was a huge gap between the population of students who going abroad between the years in China, increased by approximately seven-times from 2005 to 2015. Followed by India, with the numbers of international students from this country grow from almost 100 thousand people to nearly 230 thousand in 2015. In contrast, there was a small shift from the total number of those in South Korea during the same period, which increased by almost 50 thousand international students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 73 | view |
- Information about management positions held by women in a European country in 2006 67
- the information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009 78
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
- The developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 73
- Changes to the town of Somerville over a 10 year period 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10729613734 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90880758409 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50643776824 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.4727182491 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 148.75 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498605207117 0.215688989381 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240183047331 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129153714316 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.400985068701 0.15604864568 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109671783722 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.