Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the projections for 2050
The graph compares the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy along five decades specifically started in 2000 and projections for 2050. There were three ages categories will be figured out and units measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement age range in Yemen had to be in 15-59 group markedly whilst the most sharply increased category in Italy was noted in over 60 years old people obviously.
Regarding to the data, in Yemen initially, the most significant growth age group happened to be in 15-59 ager which started at 46.3% in 2000 and rose up to 11% higher at the end year of the fifth decade. Same case with the former age group, over 60 years old people was increasing about 2,1% bigger in 2050 absolutely. Contrastingly, the declined category had to be in 0-14 people which dropped down to 13,1% lower along the five decades dramatically.
Looking at the Italy chart, the most remarkably climbed trend was in over 60 years old people which marked at 24,1% firstly then it reached a peak about 18,2% higher after five decades shown. Unlike with the former case, abatement happened in the remaining age groups which were 15-59 and 0-14 years old people specifically got 15,4% and 2,3% lower at the projections in 2050 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | ribimultisona | 73 | view |
- US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 78
- Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the projections for 2050 73
- young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies 73
- The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 67
- The demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer and how electricity is used in an average English home 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81900452489 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54335676278 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9139784123 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236849867621 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128376094848 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160526384724 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1801638506 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109764178438 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.