A lot of people suppose that connection among nations in terms of business and culture can bring a positive development. Others argue that national identities may be disappearing because of these contacts. Although I have stronger agreement to the former opinion, my essay is to discuss both points of view.
Strengthening business contacts can lead to the national identities lost, especially among the young. When the economy is expanded, new wind of culture easily flows into countries and therefore attracts the youth. It is not hard to see that in some countries, young people tend to have a keen interest in new dishes than traditional ones. Sometimes even traditional clothes are lose their powerful impact before fashionable styles. This results in the ignorance of national identities.
However, despite the cons, culture exchange and business contacts seems to do wonders more for country development. First of all, sharing culture helps countries attain benefits mutual. For instance, in some countries like Eastern countries, instead of talking off-topic a lot before reaching the purpose, citizens can learn the “straight-to-the-point” culture from Western one. Thanks to this, working proficiency can be optimized. In addition, working together brings essential competitive pressure to the countries. At this circumstance, to avoid the strict market rule, every single country needs to utilize their potentials. Thus, this is no one but these countries enjoy the windfall of their economy development.
In the end, it is true that there are several problems associated with strengthening working and cultural contacts. However, those problems only do a little damage to the development of countries. I personally think when people absorb brilliant value, these countries will be able to reap greater benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A lot of people suppose that connection among nations in terms of bus...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
... Sometimes even traditional clothes are lose their powerful impact before fashionabl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stance, to avoid the strict market rule, every single country needs to utilize th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, talking of, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 965.302439024 178% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56310679612 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23974568049 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 106.607317073 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.099026465 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.95 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0162169701577 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00488634258536 0.103423049105 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0119195649489 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0060214911574 0.15604864568 4% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00866354406183 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 40.7170731707 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.