The given charts illustrate the average income and how an average family in the UK spend on food and clothes in two years: 2010 and 2013.
In the year of 2010, the basic income of the British family was £29000 but, in comparison to the number of that in 2013, it reduced £4000. However, the money amount which British home-owner spend in 2013 was £15000, higher than 2010 which was only £14000.
The way the typical family in the UK spend did not changed much. Families in the UK still mostly spent their average income for fruit, vegetables; meat and fish. But there is a light decrease in the proportion of money they spend. They spent more on fruit and vegetables, accounted for 30% of their spending in 2013 – compare to 26% in 2010, and dairy products with proportion of 16% in 2013 – compare to just only 12% in 2010. Meanwhile, they slightly reduced their spending on meat and fish – 23% in 2013, compare to 26% in 2010 – and clothes – 13% in 2013 compare to 15% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
... typical family in the UK spend did not changed much. Families in the UK still mostly s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46994535519 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20585058928 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3631107625 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340518082377 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162909873585 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109003017024 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269338717784 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122513211591 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.