internet users as percentages of population
The given line graph illustrates the rate of people who used the Internet in three specific countries namely American, Canada, and Mexico from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, the proportion of the digital population in each nation witnessed an upward trend over the period. Furthermore, it is clear that a much larger proportion of Americans and Canadians had access to the Internet in comparison with Mexicans. It is also of note that Canada experienced the fastest growth in Internet usage.
At the beginning of the period shown, about 20 of Americans were able to go online, compared to 10% of Mexicans and 15% of Canadians. Furthermore, the rate of people accessing the Internet in the US and Canada underwent a sharp upturn, with merely 60% while this figures for Mexico grew more slowly, reaching 25% in 2005.
For the next 4 years, approximately 100% of Canadians who browse online platforms. However, that of American and Japan were lower, around 80% and 40% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- internet users as percentages of population 78
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- Aui 11
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The line graph compares USA Canada and Mexico in terms of the proportion of people using internet from 1999 to 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t a sharp upturn, with merely 60% while this figures for Mexico grew more slowly, re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76884709778 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1744199686 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116536724215 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466801473779 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380157804995 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636915020906 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541904631628 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.