It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance, for sport and music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any children can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Often it can be consider that numbers of people are by birth talented in several fields while others are not. For example, sports and music, while some believes that every child can be instruct to being a better sports person or musician. I, however, hold the opinion that talents are precious gift from the god which can never be fixed pertaining to others.
Over the past couple of decades by fewer country's research indicates that people becomes the leader by their own efforts in certain fields or birth talent. For instance, guardian cannot move the perception of a child towards doctorate field if he or she wants to be sports person. Along with this, it has commonly seen that people are getting education, knowledge and many other things throughout the world by their mentor or families but, every child choose their own way and destination accordingly. Moreover, many intellectual people are concerned that children are always being taught those things wherein they are more fascinate relatively others.
Furthermore, many adepts assert that enforcing any kind of thing on children can create number of adverse consequences among their lives either it’s relevant with any responsibility or for certain area. For instance, if a person does not want to be a singer or he has not enough quality of becoming a singer that does not make any sense to enforce the children deliberately. Many a time I have noticed that those people who choose their life according to their desire they spend more qualitative life rather than other people.
In conclusion, I would like to conclude by saying that children should be taught those factors where they can easily take batter decision of their life instead of impose irrelevant things which is opposed to their nature. As well as, nurture of children must be in that way wherein they feel comfortable and keen to do that work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 84 | view |
- People can access games or films at any time on mobile devices such as smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 56
- Some people believe that great difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial. Do you think the advantages of greater difference in age between them outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up. 61
- Scientist has been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this, what are the reasons for that and how people can be enc 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l comfortable and keen to do that work.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 5.60731707317 642% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 315.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01587301587 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50408384006 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7782045291 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320269024482 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118753129685 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882926064184 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190588585341 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827944607544 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.