The line graph illustrates the changes in the number of people residing in Australia from different parts of the world from 1976 to 2011 and is given in millions.
Overall, the total number of foreigners rose slightly over the period. There was a marked reduction in the number of British people, while the Asians and the people from other regions saw an increase over the graph period.
In terms of total immigrants, in the beginning, the number stood at around 23 million. Next, it fell steadily to about 19 million in 1996 and then witnessed a gradual rise to 25 million in 2011.
British predominated in 1976 at about 14 million; however, the number dropped steadily throughout the period to 5 million in 2011. In contrast, 1976 saw approximately 6 million Asians and there was a sharp rise in Asian population to 15 million in 2011, marking the highest number of the foreign nation. Other immigrants started the period at around 11 million in 1976. Despite the gradual decrease to around 8 million in 1981, 1981 to 2011 saw a gradual increase to around 13 million.
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 73
- TOPIC Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 60
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 67
- Test and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages Give reasons and examples 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80107526882 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57165211724 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.043851225 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263552256 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114979475161 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881639714472 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170776094186 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105370853778 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.