The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart represents the proportion of attendance at the cinema among various age demographics between 2000 and 2011 in the US. It is clear that the percentage of people going to cinema in the US witnessed an upward trend. In addition, people who are 15 to 24 years old went to cinema more frequently than other groups.
In 2000, the 15-24-year-old group began with 15% going to the cinema, and then increased steadily to over 30% by 2004, fluctuating between 30% and 50% for the next three years. However, the figure decreased rapidly by 35% in 2008 and finishing at 52%. Meanwhile, the figure for the age of 35 and up rose consistently, beginning at 1% and ending at a high point of 13% in 2011.
Looking at the other groups, both had fluctuation roughly similar. From 2000 to 2005, cinema-goers who were 7-14 and 25-35-year-old go up slightly and reached 10% in 2005. After that, those aged 6-14 go up stably between 2006 and 2010 but suddenly declined to under 30% in 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ed an upward trend. In addition, people who are 15 to 24 years old went to cinema more ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62857142857 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70427628102 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662857142857 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1555238548 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220428662722 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963564040206 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112209545785 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155008574915 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742430563853 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.