The line graph provides information regarding the changes of the level of coffee shipped from three different regions in 2002 to 2012.
Overall, despite some fluctuations, all three regions witnessed an upward trend at the end of the period.
As the graph shows, Costa Rica’s coffee exports stood at 15 million in 2002 followed by a sharp drop to around 7 million in 2006. Then, it went up swiftly until it upsurged to 20 million in 2012. Regarding Colombia’s exports, in 2002 they shipped approximately 13 million killograms of coffee. However, over the following four years, this figure moderately rose to 12 million per year, but then their exports plunged to about 3 million in 208 prior to dramatically increased to 15 million in 2012.
By Contrast, the coffee exports of Brazil experienced an upward trend in the twelve year period. In 2002, nearly 12 million kilograms were exported and this number increased steadily to 20 million in 2008. Then the exports fell to below 20 million in 2010 before hit a high of 25 million in n 2012.
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more pe 61
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88826815642 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66183383841 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7507453523 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246209235969 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111885442239 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094160527086 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170572573383 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115944350752 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.