The line graph illustrates changes in the levels of coffee exports in three South American countries from 2002 to 2012 and is measiured in millions of kilograms, OveralI, it can be seetn that, despite some fluctuations, over the period as a whole the levels of exports rose in all three countries. Brazil and Costa Rica produced the most coffee. They began at a fairly similar level of between 12 and 15 million kilograms in 2002, but while the coffee exported from Brazil increased gradually over the following four years, exports from Costa Rica experienced a significant fall to around 7.5 million. However, they both then followed a similar trend, increasing steadily to 20 million (Costa Rica) and 25 million (Brazil). Colombia had a more erratic pattern of exports than the other two countries. Exports stood at 5 million kilograms per year in 2002, which was lower than Costa Rica or Brazil. They overtook Costa Rica in 2006, with exports reaching 12 million, but there was then a sharp fall to 2008, when exports hit a low of 2.5 million. Following this, exports increased rapidly to finish the period at 15 million.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 73
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86910994764 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51042616341 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.4162861953 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243785550846 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997364272141 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113005838947 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243785550846 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.