The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates that how many people visited three London museums: British museum, Science museum, Natural History museum from June to September in 2013.
Generally, there was fluctuated trend in museums and British Museum had the highest point in July.
The first thing you have to note is that British museum reached a peak in July, around 750 thousands visitors. Meanwhile, the number visitors of Science museums fell gradually at 370 thousands people. Similarly, there was a dramatical decrease in Natural History Museum, around 380 thousands travelers.
As is observed from the line graph, the number visitors of Science Museum reached the lowest point in August, 300 thousands. In addition, there was a significant reduction in British Museum at the same time, around 500 thousands visitors. On the other hand, a number visitors of Natural History Museum rise lightly in August approximately 380 thousands people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Lê Qui Chí | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arly, there was a dramatical decrease in Natural History Museum, around 380 thous...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43835616438 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60331644656 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568493150685 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4501602558 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.25 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174133970447 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861466090923 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621621816603 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120653687723 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601295892203 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.