The line graph illustrates the information about the statistics of tourists per month to three London museums from June to September 2013.
Strikingly, the average travellers of the British Museum was much more as compared to others. To be more specific, there were 600 thousand tourists in June. Ironically, a rise of 150 thousand had been observed in July. However, the number of commuters declined slightly in next month and reached to 500 thousand. After that, it again started increasing till September, that was 650 thousand.
Additionally, in June, the number of visitors were less in the science museum and natural history museum, that was 550 thousand and 400 thousand respectively. Afterwards, it almost maintained the same level in the next year. Lastly, the statistics of both museums remained the equal level in the last year, that was near about 450 thousand.
Overall, the number of visitors was maximum in British museum while the science museum was minimum travellers in the given period.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 78
- some people believe charity organization should only offer help to people of their own countries Other claim that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live Discuss both opinions and tell which side do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ers of the British Museum was much more as compared to others. To be more specific...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19018404908 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69647081798 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7110073217 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267980940468 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994514477573 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137829980001 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203153934058 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16362324172 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.