The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The graph illustrates the data about the ratio of visitors in three different museums in London over the 4-month period in 2013. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the number of visitors widely fluctuated and it either increased or decreased.
According to the graph, it is vividly shown that in June there is a peak of visitors in the Natural History museum with around 550 visitors per month(vpm). Then, in the following month the number of visitors fell steadily from 550 to nearly 380 vpm. Moreover, from July to August the number of visitors stabilized with only 380 vpm. However, the situation had changed from August to September, where the number of attendants increased gradually and ended at almost 480 vpm. Regarding the Science museum, the ratio of visitors was 400 per month in June, after which it dipped slightly till August to around 300 vpm. Following that, the number of visitors experienced a rise from 300 to 470 vpm.
On the other hand, the most vpm at the beginning was in British museum with around 600. Then, by July it reached a peak of almost 750 vpm. Suddenly, from July to August the number of vpm plummeted from 750 to 500 vpm. Although, in the following month ratio of vpm had increased sharply and approximately ended at 650 vpm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | manggiess | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | snowacealex | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 67
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 73
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73303167421 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45934158021 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497737556561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0734055641 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197488598091 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874327889589 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854097268984 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163707009151 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105619003953 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.