The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The change in thousands of people visiting three museums in London from June to September 2013 is displayed by the line graph, shown in numbers.
Overall, the most popular was the British Museum throughout summer. Additionally, Natural History Museum witnessed a downward trend, while two other museums showed some changes.
Initially, there were at 600 thousand visitors coming to the British Museum, being the highest number. Meanwhile, the Science Museum accounted for only two-thirds of those in the former public attraction, and the rest was higher than the latter in around 550 thousand persons.
Furthermore, the biggest aforementioned number peaked to almost 800 thousand tourists in the next month. Although it declined in the last period, this figure remained the highest. Eventually, the lowest one also increased slightly in approximately two in three of the previous, and this was closely equal with the public coming to the Natural History Museum shrinking quite significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | manggiess | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | snowacealex | 73 | view |
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 61
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 84
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50326797386 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77011630862 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692810457516 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6889962135 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223364153617 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907303405423 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104167791839 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147720180782 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117869718934 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.