The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

The line graph compares in term of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013
Overall, three museums had volatile datas per month in summer. They were seemed to fluctuate but in the end, all museums had an upward trend. The British museum was dramatically changed, and the remaining had considerable transitions.
The British museum was increased sharpply between june and july, about 750 people. Then, the rate of visitors fell by 250 persons, from 750 to 500 when it was turned to august. Fortunately, number of visitors rapidly grew, reached its highest point, at 650.
The remaining parts are Science museum and Natural History Museum. General, they all had slight transformations. The science museum fell moderately from 400 to about 350. After that, it still kept a decline of people visited the museum, at 300. Through that, we can say that the british museum had no development from june to august. But, between august and september, it was rose to 450, which is a good sign for the museum. The last one is Natural History museum. Compare to the british museum, its transition was more substantial. The museum considerably dip about from 550 to 470, And between july and september it has a marginal speed from 370 to 390, then to 490.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares in term of visit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...useums between June and September 2013 Overall, three museums had volatile data...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emaining had considerable transitions. The British museum was increased sharppl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew, reached its highest point, at 650. The remaining parts are Science museum a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al History Museum. General, they all had slight transformations. The science muse...
^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ience museum fell moderately from 400 to about 350. After that, it still kept a d...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57321561776 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9530210709 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2666666667 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319041333417 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100782751928 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106249053429 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259409746788 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199892999739 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares in term of visit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...useums between June and September 2013 Overall, three museums had volatile data...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emaining had considerable transitions. The British museum was increased sharppl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew, reached its highest point, at 650. The remaining parts are Science museum a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al History Museum. General, they all had slight transformations. The science muse...
^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ience museum fell moderately from 400 to about 350. After that, it still kept a d...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57321561776 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9530210709 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2666666667 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319041333417 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100782751928 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106249053429 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259409746788 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199892999739 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.