The line graph below shows the case of diseases caused by x virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995.
The graph illustrates the cases of diseases caused by X virus in australia from 1960 to 1995. Firstly, it was evident from the chart, how this infection gradually increased over years and it was diminished suddenly.
In 1960, only 50 persons got affected but this consistently escalated showing almost 200 patients with similar conditions in the year 1970. However, in 1975 that was raised sharply reaching 500 and remained relatively stable till 1980.
Moreover,in 1985 this declined to 400,which depicts a positive trajectory and reduced rapidly to null in the year 1990. Furthermore, over the next years, the result was plateaued with zero record.
Overall, there were lots of people infected by this virus between 1970 - 1985 and henceforth, it significantly fallen down and nullified after 1990.Although, the range of illness grew during initial decade, in the upcoming years the virus got eliminated completely from australia and thus it came back to normal as usual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 100 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 95 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Vino | 47 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | geethisha | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ively stable till 1980. Moreover,in 1985 this declined to 400,which depicts...
^^^
Line 19, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...ly fallen down and nullified after 1990.Although, the range of illness grew during initi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43225806452 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77020252418 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716129032258 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.328084504 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235713568964 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131126385485 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.236562125866 0.0843802449381 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136009589193 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147493704223 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.