The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph indicates how many times a year were some junk foods (namely pizza, hamburger, fish and chip) consumed by young adults in Australia from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, the times that teenager ate pizza and hamburgers increased dramatically and, to be particular, hamburgers underwent the fastest growth in numbers. Following the reverse pattern, there’s a drastic fall in the statistics of fish and chips.
In 1975, young teenagers just consumed pizza and hamburgers about 7 times a year. That figure was far lower than fish and chip, which were eaten 100 times. However, since then, the numbers of fish and chips plunged to less than 40 times in the final year, apart from a marginal rise again in 1985.
In sharp contrast to this, the eating times of pizza and hamburger rocketed and surpassed that of fish and chips in 1990. After that, those numbers peaked at 80 and 100 times respectively in 1995 before levelling off in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-11 | mifas meleraroth | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 78 | view |
- The percentage of workers in a company graduated with science and art degree 87
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88484848485 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47214788221 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3366299241 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124024111143 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550146240759 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081732956633 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854703671191 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915560299157 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.