The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000

The line graph depicts how the consumption of three types of fast food of teenagers in Australia changed, over a 25-year period, commencing from 1975.
Overall, with the exception of fish and chips, which went down, all categories recorded an upward trend over the period shown. Noticeably, the figures for hamburgers witnessed the most significant change among all categories.
At the beginning of the period, fish and chips experienced the highest number with 100 grams. Over the next ten years, the amount of fish and chips consumed changed erratically from 100 to 95 grams, followed by a dramatic fall to approximately 40 grams.
Turning to the numbers of hamburgers and pizza, they came in third and fourth place in 1975, with ten grams and five grams. During the next period of 25 years, figures for hamburgers showed a sharp increase to 100 grams per person. Likewise, there was a steep rise in the consumption of pizza to roughly 90 grams in 1995. Over the next five years, the amount of pizza consumed remained stable at nearly 90 grams, making it took the top place.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...eriod, commencing from 1975. Overall, with the exception of fish and chips, which went down, all ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... grams per person. Likewise, there was a steep rise in the consumption of pizza t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88043478261 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54429102585 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.915841736 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18153139117 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686482517918 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946474464625 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122114024752 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113070403829 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.