The provided line graph compares the information on how much coffee in kilograms (millions) is exported from three countries( Brazil, Colombia, and Costa Rica) over a decade from 2002 to 2012.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, over the period as a whole the levels of exports rose significantly in all three countries. However, Brazil continued to be at the top position from 2004 onwards.
Costa Rica and Colombia experienced a contrasting trend until 2008, after which both followed a similar pattern. The former started at 15kg(millions), up by nearly 10kg(millions) compared to the latter. Later on, the former plunged to the lowest value of just 7kg(millions) in 2006 before a gradual rise to 20kg(millions) in 2012. On contrary, from the least value of just 5kg(millions), the latter rose up steadily by 7kg(millions) in 2006 followed by the lowest hit of the only 2kg(millions) in 2008. However, after that, a dramatic spike pushed the value up by seven times in 2012.
On the other hand, Brazil started at a 50% less value than Costa Rica, however, the export observed a continuous upward trend while facing a few ups and downs until 2010, after that the value trebled by the end of the period.
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 74
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95734597156 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76101232465 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587677725118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2631045649 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136935526541 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567449280913 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871706021078 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106943289677 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111471131636 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.